| ISSN: 2583-4371 | ISSN: 2583-4371JOURNAL ARTICLE
Abstract: Modern Chinese prose takes “loose in form, unified in spirit” as its core trait, its language combining pictorial narrative, rhythmic beauty and restrained lyricism. The central demand of prose translation is therefore not merely the transfer of meaning, but the reproduction of the distinctive layers of literary cadence and the deep-lying emotion of the source text. Artificial-intelligence translation is now easily accessible, yet in the field of literary prose a marked aesthetic gap remains between machine output and the translations of experienced human translators. This paper selects three classic lyric prose works — Zhu Ziqing's "The Sight of My Father's Back" , "Transient Days" and Yu Dafu's "Autumn in the Old Capital" and takes Zhang Peiji's authoritative human translation and the machine translation produced by the AI model DeepSeek as its comparative corpus. Grounded in Nida's theory of functional equivalence, it carries out close reading and comparative analysis along two core dimensions: the reproduction of literary cadence and the expression of emotion. The study finds that Zhang Peiji's human translation attends at once to sentence rhythm, rhetorical texture and stylistic temperament, restoring both the outward cadence of the prose and the implicit emotions concealed beneath scenery, action and narrative. DeepSeek's machine translation, while guaranteeing basic semantic accuracy and grammatical fluency, is generally characterised by flattened syntax, loss of rhetorical beauty, thin emotional layering and an absence of imaginative openness, so that it can hardly achieve the aesthetic functional equivalence that literary translation demands. Drawing on cases from several types of prose, this paper summarises the differences between human and machine translation and proposes a practical pathway for literary prose translation and for human–machine collaborative translation, thereby offering a reference for research on modern Chinese prose in English translation and for the practice of literary translation.
Keywords: prose translation; literary cadence; emotional expression; Zhang Peiji; DeepSeek; human–machine translation comparison
Article Info: Received: 13 Aug 2026, Received in revised form: 10 Sep 2026, Accepted: 14 Sep 2026, Available online: 19 Sep 2026
[1] Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (2004). The Theory and Practice of Translation [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
[2] Zhang Peiji. (2007). Selected Modern Chinese Essays in English Translation, Volume One [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
[3] Zhu Ziqing. (2020). Prose of Zhu Ziqing [M]. Beijing: People's Literature Publishing House.
[4] Yu Dafu. (2019). Prose of Yu Dafu [M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Literature and Art Publishing House.
[5] Liu Chongde. (1991). Ten Lectures on Literary Translation [M]. Beijing: China Translation & Publishing Corporation.
[6] Wu Jianlan, Zhang Luo, & Zhu Hanghui. (2018). Differences between machine translation and human translation: A case study of literary texts [J]. Overseas English, (16).
[7] Liu Zhuan, & Tan Ping. (2026). A study of the application of machine translation to prose from the perspective of functional equivalence theory: The case of Zhu Ziqing's "Transient Days" [J]. Modern Linguistics, 14(1), 617–623.
[8] Wang Hongtao. (2023). Defending the last bastion: A sociological approach to the challenged literary translation [J]. Babel, 69(4).
[9] Hu, Y. L. (2023). Prose translation strategy study from Chinese to English from the perspective of functional equivalence [J]. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 8(1).
[10] Zhou Lingshun. (2025). From "translationese" to "balanced beauty": The core difference between AI and human translators [N]. Chinese Social Sciences Today.
[11] Kolb, W. (2023). Human and machine translation of occasionalisms in literary texts [J]. Target, 35(3).
[12] Che Mingming, & Li Hongyu. (2025). A corpus-based comparison of ChatGPT translation and human translation: The case of modern and contemporary Chinese prose [J]. Terminology and Translation, 27(3), 153–165.
[13] Machine translation's bottlenecks viewed from the diversity of modes of thinking [J]. (2023). Foreign Language Teaching, 44(1).
[14] Yu Yuanling. (2004). On the translatability of style seen from the reproduction of "The Sight of My Father's Back": Reflections on reading Zhang Peiji's English translation of the essay [J]. Journal of Yibin University, (03).
[15] Wang Weihua, & Lei Pengfei. (2023). A corpus-based study of translator style: The English translation of "Transient Days" as a case [J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 40(2).
[16] Liu Rui. (2023). A comparative analysis of English translations of "Transient Days" from the perspective of literary stylistics: The cases of Zhang Peiji and Zhu Chunshen [J]. Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation, (33).
[17] Jiang Hui, & Yu Miao. (2019). Accuracy, beauty and refinement: An appreciation of diction in English prose translation from the perspective of translation aesthetics — The case of Zhang Peiji's English translation of "Autumn in the Old Capital" [J]. Wuling Journal, (06).
[18] He Jiandi, & Tang Lijun. (2023). A study of English prose translation from the perspective of reception aesthetics: The case of Zhang Peiji's English translation of "Autumn in the Old Capital" [J]. Overseas English, (15).
[19] Pan Xing. (2023). An appreciation of Zhang Peiji's prose translation from the perspective of translation aesthetics: The case of the English translation of "Autumn in the Old Capital" [J]. Writers and Masterpieces, (10).
[20] Guo Wanyu, & Wang Honghua. (2025). A comparative study of emotional expression in human and machine translations of "The Sight of My Father's Back" [J]. China Terminology, 27(4), 91–93.
