Impact Factor (2024): 6.21IJTLE new  |  ISSN: 2583-4371
    Email Id: editor.ijtle@gmail.com
    Impact Factor (2024): 6.21IJTLE new  |  ISSN: 2583-4371
    Email Id: editor.ijtle@gmail.com

    Epistemological Rupture in the Transition from Junior to Senior High School: An Analysis of Function Concept in Chinese Mathematics Curriculum

    JOURNAL ARTICLE

    Author (s): Dagui Wu, Yunyun Zhang

    Abstract: The function concept occupies a central position in school mathematics, yet its development across educational levels involves discontinuities that resist smooth cognitive progression. In the Chinese mathematics curriculum, the transition from junior to senior high school requires students to move from a "variable dependency" conception (biànliàng yīlài guān, 变量依赖观) to a "set correspondence" conception (jǐhé duìyìng guān, 集合对应观). This paper argues that such a transition constitutes what Bachelard (1938) termed an epistemological rupture, a break in which previously adequate ways of knowing become obstacles to new knowledge. Through a theoretical analysis grounded in Bachelard's epistemological obstacle, Duval's theory of semiotic representation registers, and Sfard's reification framework, this study identifies three interrelated dimensions of the rupture: ontological (the shift from process to object), semiotic (the shift from natural-language descriptions to set-theoretic formalism), and cognitive (the demand for structural conception built on inadequate operational foundations). By examining textbook definitions, curriculum standards, and the mathematical structure of the concept itself, this paper traces the specific mechanisms through which prior knowledge becomes an impediment and proposes that recognizing this rupture as structurally necessary, rather than contingently problematic, can inform more coherent instructional design at the critical juncture between school levels.

    Keywords: function concept, epistemological rupture, semiotic representation, reification, Chinese mathematics curriculum


    Article Info: Received: 11 July 2026, Received in revised form: 08 Aug 2026, Accepted: 11 Aug 2026, Available online: 15 Aug 2026


    Bachelard, G. (2002). The formation of the scientific mind: A contribution to a psychoanalysis of objective knowledge (M. McAllester, Trans.). Clinamen Press. (Original work published 1938)

    Bednorz, D., Sommerhoff, D., & Heinze, A. (2026). Tracing learning in a digital learning environment: combining process-object theories, individual learning trajectories, and machine learning to predict concept acquisition in mathematics. Unterrichtswissenschaft. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-026-00245-z

    Brousseau, G. (1983). The obstacles of epistemology and pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 24–36). PME.

    Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (N. Cooper & R. Sutherland, Trans.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine: Registres sémiotiques et apprentissages intellectuels [Semiosis and human thought: Semiotic registers and intellectual learning]. Peter Lang.

    Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of conflicts between apparent and effective mathematical activity. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 37–52). PME.

    Hatisaru, V. (2024). Investigating secondary mathematics teachers' analogies to function. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(5), 1097–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2032440

    Ministry of Education, P. R. China. (2020). Senior high school mathematics curriculum standards (2017 ed., revised 2020) [普通高中数学课程标准(2017年版2020年修订)]. People's Education Press.

    Ministry of Education, P. R. China. (2022). Compulsory education mathematics curriculum standards (2022 ed.) [义务教育数学课程标准(2022年版)]. Beijing Normal University Press.

    People's Education Press. (2019). Mathematics (Compulsory Volume 1) [数学(必修第一册)]. (人教A版2019)

    People's Education Press. (2024). Mathematics (Grade 8, Volume 2) [数学(八年级下册)]. (人教版2024)

    Qu, D. (2016). On the connection between junior and senior high school mathematics from the perspective of spiraling upward [从螺旋上升视角谈初中、高中数学衔接]. Mathematics Teaching Reference in Middle School [中学数学教学参考], (8), 6–9.

    Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715

    Sfard, A. (2000). How is reification possible? The case of the function concept. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 45–59). PME.

    Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and the pitfalls of reification: The case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2–3), 191–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273663

    Sierpinska, A. (1992). On understanding in mathematics. Routledge.

    Tall, D. (1991). The psychology of advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 3–21). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619

    Article Metrics

    CrossRef DOI
    Total Views
    11
    Page No.
    57-69

    Cite this Article: